SCMR 1998

1998 PLP 1345 (SCMR)

Wing Cdr. (Retd.) ABDUL MUJEEB‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PRIME MINISTER OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Establishment Division, Islamabad and others‑‑‑Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Decided Date
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 315 of 1996, decided on 2ttd April, 1998.
Honorable Judges
Irshad Hasan Khan and Sh. Ijaz Nisar, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1998 PLP 1345 (SCMR)
Forum / Court Supreme Court of Pakistan
Bench Members Irshad Hasan Khan and Sh. Ijaz Nisar, JJ
Parties Wing Cdr. (Retd.) ABDUL MUJEEB‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PRIME MINISTER OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Establishment Division, Islamabad and others‑‑‑Respondents
Primary Law Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1998 PLP 1345 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1998 PLP 1345 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Irshad Hasan Khan and Sh. Ijaz Nisar, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1998 PLP 1345 (SCMR) (Wing Cdr. (Retd.) ABDUL MUJEEB‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PRIME MINISTER OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Establishment Division, Islamabad and others‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑

Representation

  • Muhammad Munir Peracha, Advocate Supreme Court and Ejaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
  • Maulvi Anwarul I‑laq, Deputy Attorney‑General for Respondents Nos. l and 2.
  • Date of hearing: 2nd April, 1998., .
  • Maulvi Anwarul I-laq, Deputy Attorney-General for Respondents Nos. l and 2.

Headnotes / Summary

(On appeal from the judgment/order, dated 12‑5‑1996, of the Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad, in Appeal No. 24(R)/1996).

‑‑Art, 21_2_(3)‑‑‑Promotion‑‑‑Leave to appeal was granted to consider whether Service Tribunal was right in not promoting the petitioner on acting charge basis inasmuch as he was found eligible for regular promotion, but due to lack of required length of service he was superseded. Respondent No. 3 in person.

Judgment & Decree

IRSHAD HASAN KHAN, J.

Leave to appeal is granted to consider whether the Federal Service Tribunal was right in not promoting the petitioner on acting charge basis inasmuch as he was found eligible for regular promotion, but due to lack of required length of service he was superseded? M.B.A/A.54/S Leave granted.