Register
PCRLJ 1994

1994 P Cr (PLP)

and 2 others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
1993-October-16
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1994 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members N/A
Parties and 2 others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 P Cr (PLP) (and 2 others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • Mian Sarfraz-ul-Hassan for Petitioners.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 498

Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.324/337-F/34

Pre-arrest bail, grant of

Compromise between the parties had been effected and a compromise deed duly signed by all concerned had been placed on record

Interim bail before arrest allowed to the accused was confirmed in circumstances.

Judgment & Decree

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3609/B of 1993, decided on 16th October, 1993.

S. 498

Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.324/337-F/34

Pre-arrest bail, grant of

Compromise between the parties had been effected and a compromise deed duly signed by all concerned had been placed on record

Interim bail before arrest allowed to the accused was confirmed in circumstances. Mian Sarfraz-ul-Hassan for Petitioners. Syed Saeed Ahmad Tirmzi for the State. Complainant in person.. The complainant, present in person, submitted that he has effected a compromise with the petitioners/accused. Further submitted that in this respect a compromise deed has been reduced into writing, which has been duly signed by all the concerned and has been placed on record and marked as P.1.

2. The petitioners, present in person, and their learned counsel confirmed what has been stated above. Therefore, the interim bail before arrest allowed to the petitioners, vide order dated 22-9-1993, is hereby confirmed. Disposed of accordingly. N.H.Q./M-1254/L Interim pre-arrest bail confirmed.

Legal Tools

Metadata Directory

  • Journal: PCRLJ
  • Volume Year: 1994
  • Citation Ref: 1994 P Cr (PLP)

Cite & Link (Backlink Generator)

Are you writing a blog or referencing this case? Copy the optimized HTML link below to cite this judgment on your website and create a legal backlink:

HTML Backlink Code:
Text Citation:

Related Judgments

  • 1994 P Cr MIR MUHAMMAD and another — Appellants Versus THE STATE — Respondent
  • 1994 P Cr ANJUM NISAR MIR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
  • 1994 P Cr MUHAMMAD TASLIM KHAN — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
  • 1994 P Cr Mst. NASRIN AKHTAR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
  • 1994 P Cr MUHAMMAD SHABBIR alias KALANDAR — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
  • 1994 P Cr NASRULLAH KHAN and 6 others — Appellants Versus THE STATE — Respondent