1994 PLP 1671 (SCMR)
MAQBOOL AHMED‑‑‑Petitioner Versus SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (E), WAPDA, 2ND CIRCLE, FAISALABAD and another‑‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1994 PLP 1671 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Rafiq Tarar and Wali Muhammad Khan, JJ |
| Parties | MAQBOOL AHMED‑‑‑Petitioner Versus SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (E), WAPDA, 2ND CIRCLE, FAISALABAD and another‑‑‑Respondents |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 PLP 1671 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 PLP 1671 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Muhammad Rafiq Tarar and Wali Muhammad Khan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 PLP 1671 (SCMR) (MAQBOOL AHMED‑‑‑Petitioner Versus SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (E), WAPDA, 2ND CIRCLE, FAISALABAD and another‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Muhammad Munir Peracha, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 17th November, 1992.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment passed by the learned Division Bench of the Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad in Appeal No. 351(R) of 1991). Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑Art. 212(3)‑‑‑Leave to appeal was granted to civil servant to consider whether his appeal before Service Tribunal was not time‑barred and whether he was not entitled to the dues claimed after having earned an order of acquittal from a Court of competent jurisdiction. ORDER MUHAMAD RAFIQ TARAR, J.‑‑‑After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner we are inclined to grant leave to consider whether the appeal of the petitioner before the learned Federal Service Tribunal was not time‑barred and whether he was not entitled to the dues claimed after having earned an order of acquittal from a Court of competent jurisdiction. A.A./M‑1965/S Leave granted.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMAD RAFIQ TARAR, J.‑‑‑After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner we are inclined to grant leave to consider whether the appeal of the petitioner before the learned Federal Service Tribunal was not time‑barred and whether he was not entitled to the dues claimed after having earned an order of acquittal from a Court of competent jurisdiction. A.A./M‑1965/S Leave granted.