1994SCMR2176 (PLP)
Establishment Division, Islamabad and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus Major (Retd.) MUHAMMAD AZAM and another‑‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1994SCMR2176 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Sajjad Ali Shah, C. J., Mir Hazar Khan Khoso |
| Parties | Establishment Division, Islamabad and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus Major (Retd.) MUHAMMAD AZAM and another‑‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994SCMR2176 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994SCMR2176 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Sajjad Ali Shah, C. J., Mir Hazar Khan Khoso.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1994SCMR2176 (PLP) (Establishment Division, Islamabad and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus Major (Retd.) MUHAMMAD AZAM and another‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Manzoor Ahmed, Advocate and Ejaz Muhammad Khan; Advocate‑on -Record for Petitioners.
- Tanvir Bashir Ansari, Advocate and Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate‑on- Record for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 9th August, 1994.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment of the Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad dated 23‑4‑1994 passed in Appeal No.401(R)/1993). ‑‑‑‑Art. 212(3)‑‑‑Leave to appeal was granted, inter alia, to consider whether or not the service of employee was terminated before the expiry of the extended period of probation in, accordance with the provisions of relevant law/rules.
Judgment & Decree
Civil Petition No.291 of 1994, decided on 9th August, 1994. (On appeal from the judgment of the Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad dated 23‑4‑1994 passed in Appeal No.401(R)/1993). ‑‑‑‑Art. 212(3)‑‑‑Leave to appeal was granted, inter alia, to consider whether or not the service of employee was terminated before the expiry of the extended period of probation in, accordance with the provisions of relevant law/rules. Manzoor Ahmed, Advocate and Ejaz Muhammad Khan; Advocate‑on -Record for Petitioners. Tanvir Bashir Ansari, Advocate and Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate‑on- Record for Respondents. Date of hearing: 9th August, 1994. MUHAMMAD MUNIR KHAN, J‑‑‑Counsel for the parties heard.
2. Leave to appeal is granted inter alia to consider whether or not the service of respondent No.l was terminated before the expiry of the extended period of probation in accordance with the provisions of relevant law/rules. M.B.A:/F‑324/S Leave granted.