2006 PLP 254 (CLC)
OWNERS' ASSOCIATION OF UZMA ARCADE through Secretary and 2 others — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Secretary, Local Government
| Citation | 2006 PLP 254 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | OWNERS' ASSOCIATION OF UZMA ARCADE through Secretary and 2 others — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Secretary, Local Government |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2006 PLP 254 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2006 PLP 254 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2006 PLP 254 (CLC) (OWNERS' ASSOCIATION OF UZMA ARCADE through Secretary and 2 others — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Secretary, Local Government). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- ----Art. 199---Constitutional petition--Levy of charged parking fee---Petitioners had questioned the levy of charged parking fee by Authority---Resolution of council of Authority, had directed, inter alia, that charged parking should be stopped forthwith and such resolution had been given effect to---Both counsel for petitioners agreed that without prejudice to question of validity of levy, petition had become infructuous, and they would not press the' same---Petition was disposed of accordingly.
- Rafiq Rajori, A.A.-G. for Respondent No.1.
- Manzoor Ahmad for Respondent No.2.
Headnotes / Summary
Art. 199
Constitutional petition--Levy of charged parking fee
Petitioners had questioned the levy of charged parking fee by Authority
Resolution of council of Authority, had directed, inter alia, that charged parking should be stopped forthwith and such resolution had been given effect to
Both counsel for petitioners agreed that without prejudice to question of validity of levy, petition had become infructuous, and they would not press the' same
Petition was disposed of accordingly.
Judgment & Decree
The petitioners had questioned the levy of charged parking fee by the respondent No.2. Mr. Manzoor Ahmad has placed on record copy of a Resolution of the Council of the respondent No.2 directing, inter alia, that the charged parking should be stopped forthwith and according to the learned counsel such Resolution has been given effect. Both A Messrs Lakhani and Jawaid Siddiqui agree that without prejudice to the question of validity of the levy the petitions have become infructuous, therefore, do not press the same. Accordingly the same are disposed of. All the learned counsel including Mr. Manzoor Ahmad, suggest that the amount already deposited in Court, may be spent on development of roads, and upon proof being submitted, the respondent No.2 will be entitled to withdraw the amount so deposited. H.B.T./O-1/K????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Order accordingly.