1981 PLP 404 (CLC)
KHUSHAB GUL AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus NAWAB KHAN AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
| Citation | 1981 PLP 404 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Ilyas, J |
| Parties | KHUSHAB GUL AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus NAWAB KHAN AND ANOTHER‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 404 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 404 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Ilyas, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 404 (CLC) (KHUSHAB GUL AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus NAWAB KHAN AND ANOTHER‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Tufail Dhami for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑ O. 1, r. 8‑Public advertisement-Service of notice by beat of drum Held, a service of notice through public advertisement and falls within purview of O. 1, r.
8. If the Legislatures wanted to convey that by public advertisement they meant proclamation in the newspaper only they would have used the words "proclamation in a newspaper" instead of the words "public advertisement". They employed the words "public advertisement" with a view to allowing service through all possible means of publicity including proclamation in a newspaper Held, that the service of notice by beat of drum was also service of notice through public advertisement and thus the provisions of rule 8 of Order I were duly observed by the trial Courts.
Judgment & Decree
NAWAB KHAN AND ANOTHER‑Respondents Civil Revision No. 1954/1) of 1980, decided on 29th November, 1980. ‑‑‑ O. 1, r. 8‑Public advertisement-Service of notice by beat of drum Held, a service of notice through public advertisement and falls within purview of O. 1, r.
8. If the Legislatures wanted to convey that by public advertisement they meant proclamation in the newspaper only they would have used the words "proclamation in a newspaper" instead of the words "public advertisement". They employed the words "public advertisement" with a view to allowing service through all possible means of publicity including proclamation in a newspaper Held, that the service of notice by beat of drum was also service of notice through public advertisement and thus the provisions of rule 8 of Order I were duly observed by the trial Courts. Muhammad Tufail Dhami for Petitioner.