SCMR 1983

1983 PLP 568 (SCMR)

YAHYA BAKHTIAR-Appellant Versus THE STATE-Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
Criminal Appeal No. Q-1 of 1981, decided on 10th February, 1983.
Honorable Judges
Muhammad Haleem, Actg. C. J., Aslam Riaz Hussain, Nasim Hasan Shah, M. S. H. Quraishi and Mian Burhanuddin Khan, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1983 PLP 568 (SCMR)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members Muhammad Haleem, Actg. C. J., Aslam Riaz Hussain, Nasim Hasan Shah, M. S. H. Quraishi and Mian Burhanuddin Khan, JJ
Parties YAHYA BAKHTIAR-Appellant Versus THE STATE-Respondent
Primary Law Holders of Representative Offices (Punishment for Misconduct) Order (P.P.P.O.) 16 of 1977)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1983 PLP 568 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Holders of Representative Offices (Punishment for Misconduct) Order (P.P.P.O.) 16 of 1977) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1983 PLP 568 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Haleem, Actg. C. J., Aslam Riaz Hussain, Nasim Hasan Shah, M. S. H. Quraishi and Mian Burhanuddin Khan, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1983 PLP 568 (SCMR) (YAHYA BAKHTIAR-Appellant Versus THE STATE-Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Holders of Representative Offices (Punishment for Misconduct) Order (P.P.P.O.) 16 of 1977)

Representation

  • Fakhruddin G. Ebrahim, Senior Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan instructed by Muhammad Afzal Siddique, Advocate-on-Record for Appellant.
  • Dates of hearing : 22nd to 24th January and 5th to 10th February, 1983.
  • Fakhruddin G. Ebrahim, Senior Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan instructed by Muhammad Afzal Siddique, Advocate‑on‑Record for Appellant.
  • Raza A. Khan, Deputy Attorney‑General instructed by Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record for the State.

Headnotes / Summary

Art. 2 (aa)-Election rigging-Rigging on large scale in constitu ency-Prosecution failed to prove if same had been done by accused either directly or through any person-Accused acquitted in circum stances. Raza A. Khan, Deputy Attorney-General instructed by Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate-on-Record for the State.

Judgment & Decree

Holders of Representative Offices (Punishment for Misconduct) Order (P.P.P.O.) 16 of 1977)‑

Art. 2 (aa)‑Election rigging‑Rigging on large scale in constitu ency‑Prosecution failed to prove if same had been done by accused either directly or through any personAccused acquitted in circum stances. Fakhruddin G. Ebrahim, Senior Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan instructed by Muhammad Afzal Siddique, Advocate‑on‑Record for Appellant. Raza A. Khan, Deputy Attorney‑General instructed by Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record for the State. Dates of hearing : 22nd to 24th January and 5th to 10th February, 1983. MUHAMMAD HALEEM, ACTG. C. J.‑We have heard learned counsel for the. parties at length for several days and have reached the conclusion that although rigging was done on a large scale in the Constituency in question but the prosecution has failed to establish that it had been done by the appellant either directly or through any other person within the meaning of Article 2 (aa) of the Holders of Representative Offices (Punishment for Misconduct) Order, 1977 (President's Post Proclamation Order No. 16 of 1977). Accordingly for the reasons to be given later, we set aside the judgment of the Special Court dated 31‑3‑1981 and acquit the appellant. His bail bonds are discharged. . Appeal allowed.