1986 PLP (1) (MLD)
AMIR BAKHSH and another‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1986 PLP (1) (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Ijaz Nisar, J |
| Parties | AMIR BAKHSH and another‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP (1) (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP (1) (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Ijaz Nisar, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP (1) (MLD) (AMIR BAKHSH and another‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Sahibzada Farooq Ali and Altaf Ibrahim Qureshi for Petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑S. 426‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 326/34‑‑Sentence, suspension of‑‑No grievous injury attributed to accused‑‑Operation of sentence suspended and accused granted bail in circumstances. Muhammad Ishaque Khan Lodhi for the State.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑S. 426‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 326/34‑‑Sentence, suspension of‑‑No grievous injury attributed to accused‑‑Operation of sentence suspended and accused granted bail in circumstances. Sahibzada Farooq Ali and Altaf Ibrahim Qureshi for Petitioners. Muhammad Ishaque Khan Lodhi for the State. This is an application for suspension of sentences of Amir Bakhsh and Fida Hussain who have been convicted under section 326/34, P.P.C. along with Allah Wasaya and sentenced to 7 years, R.I. and a fine of Rs. 10,000 each.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has withdrawn the application of Amir Bakhsh. He states that he would apply again at the appropriate stage and has pressed for .the suspension of sentence of Fida Hussain only. It is stated that no grievous injury is attributed to him and the accused to whom that is attributed has not applied for suspension of sentences. In the above circumstances, I suspend the operation of sentence of Fida Hussain and admit him to bail in the sum of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of A. C. Kot Addu. S.A Appeal accepted