SCMR 1990

1990 PLP 314 (SCMR)

FALAK SHER‑‑Petitioner. Versus SACHAL and another‑‑Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 25‑K of 1989 in Criminal Appeal No. 23‑K of 1988, decided on 22nd June, 1989.
Honorable Judges
Abdul Kadir Shaikh and Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1990 PLP 314 (SCMR)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members Abdul Kadir Shaikh and Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ
Parties FALAK SHER‑‑Petitioner. Versus SACHAL and another‑‑Respondents
Primary Law Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1990 PLP 314 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1990 PLP 314 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Abdul Kadir Shaikh and Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1990 PLP 314 (SCMR) (FALAK SHER‑‑Petitioner. Versus SACHAL and another‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑

Representation

  • Mirza Abdul Rashid, Advocate Supreme Court and Muzaffar Hassan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
  • Nemo for Respondents.
  • Date of hearing: 22nd June, 1989.

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑‑Art.185(3)‑‑‑While granting leave to appeal direction for issue of bailable warrant was omitted inadvertently‑‑‑Direction was issued accordingly.

Judgment & Decree

‑‑‑Art.185(3)‑‑‑While granting leave to appeal direction for issue of bailable warrant was omitted inadvertently‑‑‑Direction was issued accordingly. Mirza Abdul Rashid, Advocate Supreme Court and Muzaffar Hassan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner. Nemo for Respondents. Date of hearing: 22nd June, 1989. ABDUL KADIR SHAIKH, J.‑‑While granting Leave to Appeal it was orally directed that bailable warrants shall issue against respondent‑1 in the sum of Rs.25,000 with two sureties but due to an inadvertent omission the aforesaid direction was omitted in the order of this Court dated 12‑5‑1988. We, therefore, direct that bailable warrants returnable through the Sessions Court, Nawab Shah, in the sum of Rs.25,000 with two sureties, each in the like amount, shall issue against respondent‑1 for appearance before this Court. M.A.K./F‑136/S Order accordingly.