1995SCMR949 (PLP)
Syed IMRAN RAZA ZAIDI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1995SCMR949 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Sajjad Ali Shah, C.J., Irshad Hasan Khan and Mukhtar Ahmed Junejo, JJ |
| Parties | Syed IMRAN RAZA ZAIDI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1995SCMR949 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1995SCMR949 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Sajjad Ali Shah, C.J., Irshad Hasan Khan and Mukhtar Ahmed Junejo, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1995SCMR949 (PLP) (Syed IMRAN RAZA ZAIDI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Syed Jamshed Ali, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by S. Abul Aasim Jafri, Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) for Petitioner.
- Sh. Ziaullah, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Mahmood A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) for Respondent No. 3.
- Date of hearing: 23rd November, 1994.
Headnotes / Summary
Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑Art. 212‑‑‑Miscellaneous application for grant of stay which was refused at the time of grant of leave‑‑‑Counsel of parties agreed that there was no need of retaining record for paper books were ready and documents could be added thereto‑‑‑Record was sent to Service Tribunal‑‑‑Prayer of counsel of parties that whole appeal be taken up for hearing out of turn was accepted and application for grant of stay was dismissed as being infructuous.
Judgment & Decree
In this miscellaneous application prayer is for grant of stay, which was refused at the time of grant of leave. As the learned counsel for the parties, present in the Court, agree that there is no need of retaining the record as the paper books are ready and documents can be added, hence we direct that the record be sent to the Service Tribunal. Secondly, the counsel for the parties request that the whole appeal can be taken up for hearing out of turn. Order accordingly. In the result this application is dismissed as being infructuous. AA./1216 Order accordingly.