SCMR 1991

1991 PLP 372(1) (SCMR)

Brig. (Retd.) N.A. ASHRAF — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, through Secretary, Establishment Division and 2 others — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.335-R of 1989, decided on 19th February, 1990.
Honorable Judges
Shafiur Rahman and Rustam S. Sidhwa, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1991 PLP 372(1) (SCMR)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members Shafiur Rahman and Rustam S. Sidhwa, JJ
Parties Brig. (Retd.) N.A. ASHRAF — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, through Secretary, Establishment Division and 2 others — Respondents
Primary Law Constitution of Pakistan (1973)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1991 PLP 372(1) (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1991 PLP 372(1) (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Shafiur Rahman and Rustam S. Sidhwa, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1991 PLP 372(1) (SCMR) (Brig. (Retd.) N.A. ASHRAF — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, through Secretary, Establishment Division and 2 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)

Representation

  • Shah Abdur Rashid, Advocate Supreme Court and Manzoor Ilahi, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
  • Nemo for Respondents.
  • Date of hearing: 19th February, 1990.
  • Shah Abdur Rashid, Advocate Supreme Court and Manzoor Ilahi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

(From the judgment of the Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad dated 25-4-1989 passed, in Appeal, No.397(R) of 1987).

Art. 212(3)

Leave to appeal was granted to examine whether term of employment itself did not by condition thereof visualize payment of part of pension, in any case, to petitioner.

Judgment & Decree

SHAFIUR RAHMAN, J.‑‑‑Leave to appeal is granted to examine, inter alia, whether the term of employment itself did not by condition No.1 visualize payment of part of Pension, in any case, to the Petitioner.

2. To be heard on the present record with liberty to parties to file additional documents, alongwith other cases on similar subject. H.B.T./N‑240/S Leave granted.