P L D 1991 Lahore 346 (PLP)
BILAL HUSSAIN — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | P L D 1991 Lahore 346 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | BILAL HUSSAIN — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D 1991 Lahore 346 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D 1991 Lahore 346 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: P L D 1991 Lahore 346 (PLP) (BILAL HUSSAIN — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 8
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.307
Suppression of Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act (XV of 1975), S.4
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S.561-A
Jurisdiction of Special Courts for Suppression of Terrorist Activities--Accused had allegedly committed offence under S.307, P.P.C. with an unlicensed Kalashnikov
Kalashnikov was not recovered
Contention was raised by accused that since neither Kalashnikov nor any empty was recovered, Special Court had no jurisdiction
Held, going armed with Kalashnikov without licence fell within the prohibition imposed by S.8 of Arms Ordinance, 1965 and offence committed under S.8 in combination with an offence under S.307, P.P.C. thus was triable by Special Court under S.4 of Act, 1975. [p. 347] A
Judgment & Decree
THE STATE--Respondent Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.64-Q of 1991, decided on 21st April, 1991. West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (X$ of 1965)
S. 8
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.307
Suppression of Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act (XV of 1975), S.4
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S.561-A
Jurisdiction of Special Courts for Suppression of Terrorist Activities--Accused had allegedly committed offence under S.307, P.P.C. with an unlicensed Kalashnikov
Kalashnikov was not recovered
Contention was raised by accused that since neither Kalashnikov nor any empty was recovered, Special Court had no jurisdiction
Held, going armed with Kalashnikov without licence fell within the prohibition imposed by S.8 of Arms Ordinance, 1965 and offence committed under S.8 in combination with an offence under S.307, P.P.C. thus was triable by Special Court under S.4 of Act, 1975. [p. 347] A Raja Abdur Rahman.for Applicant.