1991 PLP 373 (SCMR)
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Communications, Islamabad and 3 others — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD SULEMAN — Respondent
| Citation | 1991 PLP 373 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Shafiur Rahman and Rustam S. Sidhwa, JJ |
| Parties | FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Communications, Islamabad and 3 others — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD SULEMAN — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1991 PLP 373 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1991 PLP 373 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Shafiur Rahman and Rustam S. Sidhwa, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1991 PLP 373 (SCMR) (FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Communications, Islamabad and 3 others — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD SULEMAN — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Afzal Siddiqui, Deputy Attorney-General for Pakistan and Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners.
- M. Munir Peracha, Advocate Supreme Court and Manzoor Ilahi, Advocate-on-Record for Respondent.
- Date of hearing: 21st February, 1990.
- Muhammad Afzal Siddiqui, Deputy Attorney‑General for Pakistan and Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
- M. Munir Peracha, Advocate Supreme Court and Manzoor Ilahi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent.
Headnotes / Summary
(From the judgment of the Federal Service Tribunal, dated 18-9-1988, passed in Appeal No.376(P) of 1986).
Art. 212(3)
Lave to appeal was granted to examine questions of law, namely whether view taken by Service Tribunal with regard to appeal having been tiled by respondent with department within time, was correct and in accord with law on the subject and whether in view of reply of respondent to the charge-sheet and admission of guilt with regard to charges, the irregularities in enquiry proceedings noted by Tribunal, could be of avail to him and result in his reinstatement.
Judgment & Decree
SHAFIUR RAHMAN, J.‑‑‑Leave to appeal is granted under Article 212(3) of the Constitution to examine the following questions of law arising out of the decision of the Service Tribunal dated 18‑9‑1988:‑‑ (1) Whether the view taken by the Service Tribunal with regard to the appeal having been riled by the respondent with the department within time, is correct and in accord with law on the subject? (2) Whether in view of his reply to the charge‑sheet (page 58 of the Paper‑Book) and the admission of guilt with regard to the charges (pages 65 and 66 of the Paper Book), the irregularities in the enquiry proceedings noted by the Tribunal, could be of avail to him and result in his reinstatement?
2. The impugned order of the Service Tribunal is suspended. H.B.T./F‑176/S Leave granted.