1999 PLP 1904 (CLC)
Mst. IMTIAZ AKHTAR‑‑‑Petitioner Versus DEPUTY EDUCATION OFFICER (W),
| Citation | 1999 PLP 1904 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Ihsanul Haq Chaudhry, J |
| Parties | Mst. IMTIAZ AKHTAR‑‑‑Petitioner Versus DEPUTY EDUCATION OFFICER (W), |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1999 PLP 1904 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1999 PLP 1904 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Ihsanul Haq Chaudhry, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1999 PLP 1904 (CLC) (Mst. IMTIAZ AKHTAR‑‑‑Petitioner Versus DEPUTY EDUCATION OFFICER (W),). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Nemo for Petitioner.
- Addl. A.‑G. for Respondent No. 1.
Headnotes / Summary
Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ ,. ‑‑‑‑Arts. 199 & 212‑‑‑Constitutionaf petition‑‑‑Civil service‑‑‑Transfer of civil servant
Petitioner had remained posted at one place for more than three years and normal period of posting at one place was three years‑‑‑Constitutional petition of civil servant challenging order of his transfer was dismissed in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
The petitioner through this Constitutional petition has challenged his transfer order, dated 16‑12‑1993. The petition came up for limine hearing on 9‑1‑1994, when the impugned order was suspended. In this way the petitioner had remained posted in the same school, even more than three years, A normal period of posting at one place on the basis of order issued by this Court. This fact alone is sufficient to dismiss the writ petition. This is not all. The order seems to have been passed at the departmental level, therefore, writ A petition is not competent in view of Article 212 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan. Q.M.H./I‑69/L Petition dismissed.