1986 PLP 131 (SCMR)
Mst. ROBINA SHAFIQ‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1986 PLP 131 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Aslam Riaz Hussain, Actg. C.J. Nasim Hasan Shah and S.A. Nusrat, JJ |
| Parties | Mst. ROBINA SHAFIQ‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP 131 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP 131 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Aslam Riaz Hussain, Actg. C.J. Nasim Hasan Shah and S.A. Nusrat, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP 131 (SCMR) (Mst. ROBINA SHAFIQ‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- ‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Attorney‑on‑Record for petitioner stating that he had no instructions and thus not pressing petition‑‑Petition dismissed as not pressed.
- Ch. Akhter Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- K.E. Bhatti, Advocate‑on‑Record (Absent) for Complainant.
- ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN ACTG. C.J.‑‑The learned Advocate‑on‑Record for the petitioner states that he had no instructions. Therefore he does not press the petition which is dismissed as not pressed.
Headnotes / Summary
K.E. Bhatti, Advocate‑on‑Record (Absent) for Complainant.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Petition No. 92‑R of 1985, decided on 8th October, 1985. ‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Attorney‑on‑Record for petitioner stating that he had no instructions and thus not pressing petition‑‑Petition dismissed as not pressed. Ch. Akhter Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner. K.E. Bhatti, Advocate‑on‑Record (Absent) for Complainant. ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN ACTG. C.J.‑‑The learned Advocate‑on‑Record for the petitioner states that he had no instructions. Therefore he does not press the petition which is dismissed as not pressed. M . Y . H . Petition dismissed.