2001 PLP 1081 (YLR)
DUR JAN — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2001 PLP 1081 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Ghulam Nabi Soomro and Atta-ur-Rehman, JJ |
| Parties | DUR JAN — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2001 PLP 1081 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2001 PLP 1081 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Ghulam Nabi Soomro and Atta-ur-Rehman, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2001 PLP 1081 (YLR) (DUR JAN — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
Ss. 498, 499 & 502
Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), S.9(b)-- Grant of protective bail
Return of surety documents-- Accused who was granted protective bail for a limited period having died the documents furnished by the surety were no more required to be retained
Nazir of the Court was directed to return the surety documents to the applicant who stood surety for the accused. Nisho Khan for Applicant. Habib Ahmed, A.A.-G.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
Ss. 498, 499 & 502
Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), S.9(b)-- Grant of protective bail
Return of surety documents-- Accused who was granted protective bail for a limited period having died the documents furnished by the surety were no more required to be retained
Nazir of the Court was directed to return the surety documents to the applicant who stood surety for the accused. Nisho Khan for Applicant. Habib Ahmed, A.A.-G. This is an application for return of surety documents, furnished by the applicant Ibrahim who had stood surety for accused Dur Muhammad. Accused Dur Muhammad was granted protective bail by this Court on 30-9-1999 for a period of 15 days. The said accused Dur Muhammad is stated to have expired on 30-9-2000. Copy of his death certificate is annexed. It is urged by the learned counsel for the applicant surety that the concession of protective bail granted to the accused Dur Muhammad was only for a limited period and the documents furnished by the applicant/ surety Ibrahim are no more required to be retained by the Nazir's office. Since the protective bail was granted to the deceased/accused Dur Muhammad only for a limited period and the accused to the applicant/surety in the above circumstances as the same need not be retained by the Nazir's office. Accordingly, the Nazir of this Court is directed to return the surety documents, i.e. lease Deed, to the applicant/surety documents, i.e. lease Deed, to the applicant/surety Ibrahim son of Tabeer upon proper verification and identification M.A. No. 146 of 2001 is disposed of. H.B.T./D-12/K Application allowed.