1989 PLP R1210 (SCMR)
SALAHUD DIN‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF N.‑W.F.P. through Secretary, Education and 84 others‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1989 PLP R1210 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Afzal Zullah, Usman Ali Shah and Ali Hussain Qazilbash, JJ |
| Parties | SALAHUD DIN‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF N.‑W.F.P. through Secretary, Education and 84 others‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Civil service‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP R1210 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil service‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP R1210 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Zullah, Usman Ali Shah and Ali Hussain Qazilbash, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP R1210 (SCMR) (SALAHUD DIN‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF N.‑W.F.P. through Secretary, Education and 84 others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Khan Imtiaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate Supreme Court and Advocate -on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 11th April, 1989.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment dated 24th February, 1998 of the. Service Tribunal N.‑W.F.P. Peshawar m Appeal No.42 of 1987).
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.212(3)‑‑Seniority‑‑Leave to appeal granted so as to examine the effect of the judgment of Supreme Court in Muhammad Rahim and others v. Muhammad Aurangzeb and others 1986 S C M R
873. Muhammad Rahim, Lecturer and 28 others v. Muhammad Aurangzeb, Lecturer and 94 others 1986 S C M R 873 ref.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑‑Leave to appeal has been sought by the petitioner (a Lecturer), against the dismissal by the Service Tribunal, N.‑W.F.P., of his service appeal which had arisen out of a dispute relating to his seniority. After hearing the learned counsel we consider it a fit case for grant of leave to appeal; so as to examine the effect of the judgment of this Court in Muhammad Rahim, Lecturer and 28 others v. Muhammad Aurangzeb, Lecturer l and 94 others (1986 S C M R 873). The appeal shall be prepared on present record with direction to the parties to file all additional documents which would be necessary for its disposal. M.BA./S‑274/S Leave granted.