1989 P Cr (PLP)
GULZAR HUSSAIN SHAH‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE Respondent
| Citation | 1989 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Fazal Karim and Rashid Aziz Khan, JJ |
| Parties | GULZAR HUSSAIN SHAH‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Fazal Karim and Rashid Aziz Khan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 P Cr (PLP) (GULZAR HUSSAIN SHAH‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Malik Nazar Farid Khokhar for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing: 4th February, 1989.
Headnotes / Summary
‑S. 497‑‑Bail‑‑Accused was attributed a Lalkara and a push which he allegedly gave to deceased with a Sota‑‑Doctor who performed post‑mortem examination of dead body of deceased gave opinion that abrasion said to have been caused by push of accused to deceased could not be result of Sota blow‑‑Accused admitted to bail in circumstances. Kh. Saeed‑ul‑Hassan for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1 of 1989 in Criminal Appeal No. 870 of 1988, decided on 4th February, 1989.
‑S. 497‑‑Bail‑‑Accused was attributed a Lalkara and a push which he allegedly gave to deceased with a Sota‑‑Doctor who performed post‑mortem examination of dead body of deceased gave opinion that abrasion said to have been caused by push of accused to deceased could not be result of Sota blow‑‑Accused admitted to bail in circumstances. Malik Nazar Farid Khokhar for Petitioner. Kh. Saeed‑ul‑Hassan for the State. Date of hearing: 4th February, 1989. RASHID AZIZ KHAN, J
‑ The only part attributed to the petitioner was that he had shouted a Lalkara, that he had a Sota and had with it given a push to Muhammad Aslam deceased. The doctor, who performed the post- mortem examination of the dead body of Muhammad Aslam, was however, of the opinion that the abrasion said to have been caused by the push given by the petitioner to the deceased Muhammad Aslam could not be the result of Sota blow. We, therefore, accept the petition, suspend the sentence of the petitioner and allow the petitioner to be released on bail on furnishing a bail bond in the sum of Rs.30,000 (Rupees thirty thousand only) with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C./Duty Magistrate, concerned. M.Y.H./G‑222/L Bail granted.