YLR 2017

2017 PLP 1076 (YLR)

SHAHID MEHMOOD CH. — Petitioner Versus The STATE and another — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Crl. Misc. No.9155-B of 2016, decided on 22nd September, 2016.
Honorable Judges
Mazhar Iqbal Sidhu, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2017 PLP 1076 (YLR)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Mazhar Iqbal Sidhu, J
Parties SHAHID MEHMOOD CH. — Petitioner Versus The STATE and another — Respondents
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2017 PLP 1076 (YLR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2017 PLP 1076 (YLR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Mazhar Iqbal Sidhu, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2017 PLP 1076 (YLR) (SHAHID MEHMOOD CH. — Petitioner Versus The STATE and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • Azam Nazir Tarar and Mazhar Ali Ghallu for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 497

Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 302, 379, 411, 201 & 34

Qatl-i-amd, theft, dishonestly receiving stolen property, causing disappearance evidence of offence, common intention

Bail, refusal of

Unwitnessed crime

Allegation against the accused was that he along with co-accused had committed murder

Case of prosecution revolved around circumstantial evidence, starting with the allegation that complainant lastly talked to deceased on cell phone which belonged to the accused

Accused was identified by the prosecution witnesses through the test-identification parade

Mobile telephone set and motor bike of deceased were recovered on the disclosure of accused

Accused pointed out the place where dead body of deceased was thrown

All ex-post facto evidence connected the accused with the commission of offence

Offence fell within the prohibitory clause of S. 497, Cr.P.C.

Accused was refused bail in circumstances. Aftab Ahmad Bajwah and Shahzad Saleem Warriach for the Complainant.