1981 PLP 1651 (CLC)
Mst. GHULAM FATIMA AND 5 others‑‑Appellants Versus Mst, ANWAR alias ANWARI BEGUM AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
| Citation | 1981 PLP 1651 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | Mst. GHULAM FATIMA AND 5 others‑‑Appellants Versus Mst, ANWAR alias ANWARI BEGUM AND ANOTHER‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | (a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑, (b) Muslim Family Laws Ordinance (VIII of 1961)‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 1651 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: (a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑, (b) Muslim Family Laws Ordinance (VIII of 1961)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 1651 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 1651 (CLC) (Mst. GHULAM FATIMA AND 5 others‑‑Appellants Versus Mst, ANWAR alias ANWARI BEGUM AND ANOTHER‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
‑ Ss. 5 & 6‑Polygamy‑‑Contravention of provisions of Ss. w & 6‑Can be visited with punishment provided therein‑Marriage not registered or' contracted in contravention of S. 6, held, not invalid.‑‑[Polygamy].
Judgment & Decree
Regular Second Appeal No. 93 of 1981, decided on 27th April, 1981 (a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑
‑‑ S. 100 read with Muslim Family Laws Ordinance (VIII of 1961), S. 5 ‑Kabeennama drafted before Nikah ceremony, held, does not by itself justify conclusion of its not being a genuine document. (b) Muslim Family Laws Ordinance (VIII of 1961)‑
‑ Ss. 5 & 6‑Polygamy‑‑Contravention of provisions of Ss. w & 6‑Can be visited with punishment provided therein‑Marriage not registered or' contracted in contravention of S. 6, held, not invalid.‑‑[Polygamy]. Hakam Qureshi for Appellants.