P L D 1959 W (PLP)
ISMAIL and others‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
| Citation | P L D 1959 W (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | |
| Bench Members | A. K. Malik, Member, Board of Revenue, West Pakistan |
| Parties | ISMAIL and others‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D 1959 W (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D 1959 W (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the bench comprising: A. K. Malik, Member, Board of Revenue, West Pakistan.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: P L D 1959 W (PLP) (ISMAIL and others‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Headnotes / Summary
Northern India Canal and Drainage Act (VIII of 1873) Revision--‑Order of Commissioner final--‑Revision against order of Commissioner‑--Whether competent.
Judgment & Decree
Northern India Canal and Drainage Act (VIII of 1873) Revision--‑Order of Commissioner final--‑Revision against order of Commissioner‑--Whether competent. These are two applications Nos. 268 and, 269 of 1955‑56 for revision against the order of the Commissioner, Multan Division. dated 7‑5‑56, upholding the order of the D. C. O. Burala Division, dated 25‑10‑55, whereby penal charges were imposed on the petitioners for unauthorised irrigation of their lands. The counsel for the petitioners is not present to‑day. Only Raja has appeared on behalf of the other petitioners. Rules 100 and 101 of Rules framed under the Northern India Canal and Drainage Act, which empowered the Financial. The Commissioners to interfere in revision with the orders of the Commissioners in these cases have since been cancelled. The order of the Commissioner is final and no revision lies. Both the applications are accordingly dismissed. K. M. A. Applications dismissed.