MLD 2009

2009 PLP 506 (MLD)

Messrs LISKO PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. — Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Health and another — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Karachi
Decided Date
2007-October-5
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2009 PLP 506 (MLD)
Forum / Court Karachi
Bench Members N/A
Parties Messrs LISKO PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. — Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Health and another — Respondents
Primary Law Constitution of Pakistan (1973)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2009 PLP 506 (MLD)?

This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2009 PLP 506 (MLD)?

The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2009 PLP 506 (MLD) (Messrs LISKO PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. — Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Health and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)

Representation

  • Raja Qureshi for Petitioner.
  • Zafar Khan for Respondent.

Headnotes / Summary

Art. 199

Constitutional petition

Petitioner had impugned the action of authorities whereby petitioner was declared qualified to undertake contract work of the authorities

Contract period was stated have been over

Constitutional petition was rendered infructuous

Petitioner, however, reserved its right, if not considered in accordance with law in subsequent tender

Constitutional petition was disposed of as infructuous along with pending applications.

Judgment & Decree

Petitioner had impugned the action of respondents whereby petitioner was not qualified to undertake contract work of the respondent. It is stated that contract period has been over. Petition is rendered infructuous. Petitioner reserves its right if not considered in accordance with law in subsequent tender. Petition is disposed of as infructuous along with pending applications. H.B.T./L-11/K Petition dismissed.