CLC 1981

1981 PLP 1425 (CLC)

M.K.A . ZAI‑Petitioner Versus MESSRS AERO TRAVELS, KARACHI‑Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Karachi
Decided Date
Civil Revision No, 14 of 1979, decided on 1st April 1980.
Honorable Judges
Sajjad Ali Shah, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1981 PLP 1425 (CLC)
Forum / Court Karachi
Bench Members Sajjad Ali Shah, J
Parties M.K.A . ZAI‑Petitioner Versus MESSRS AERO TRAVELS, KARACHI‑Respondents
Primary Law Civil Procedure Code (V of 1918)‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 1425 (CLC)?

This judgment primarily cites: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1918)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 1425 (CLC)?

The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Sajjad Ali Shah, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 1425 (CLC) (M.K.A . ZAI‑Petitioner Versus MESSRS AERO TRAVELS, KARACHI‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Civil Procedure Code (V of 1918)‑

Representation

  • M. M. A. Zai for Appellant.
  • Sher Afghan for Respondents.
  • Date of hearing: 31st March, 1980.

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑‑ S. 115‑‑Petitioner, not denying counsel having appeared in case at some stage before and record showing application for adjourn ment having been drafted and signed by counsel‑‑Omission of counsel s name in vakalatnama being accidental and a mere irregu larity, held, should have been allowed to be rectified by trial Court. Toor Gul v. Mst. Mumtaz Begum P L D 1972 S C 9 ; Messrs Nabi Bux and Sons v. Pakistan through the Secretary Ministry of industries and National Resources P L D 1969 Kar. 210 fol.

Judgment & Decree

Civil Revision No, 14 of 1979, decided on 1st April 1980. ‑‑‑ S. 115‑‑Petitioner, not denying counsel having appeared in case at some stage before and record showing application for adjourn ment having been drafted and signed by counsel‑‑Omission of counsel s name in vakalatnama being accidental and a mere irregu larity, held, should have been allowed to be rectified by trial Court. Toor Gul v. Mst. Mumtaz Begum P L D 1972 S C 9 ; Messrs Nabi Bux and Sons v. Pakistan through the Secretary Ministry of industries and National Resources P L D 1969 Kar. 210 fol. M. M. A. Zai for Appellant. Sher Afghan for Respondents. Date of hearing: 31st March, 1980.