1984 PLP 1520 (PLC(CS))
KHAN MUHAMMAD Versus THF CHIEF CORPORATION OFFICER, MUNICIPAL
| Citation | 1984 PLP 1520 (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Abdul Ghafoor Khan Lodhi, Appellate Tribunal |
| Parties | KHAN MUHAMMAD Versus THF CHIEF CORPORATION OFFICER, MUNICIPAL |
| Primary Law | Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1984 PLP 1520 (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1984 PLP 1520 (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab bench comprising: Muhammad Abdul Ghafoor Khan Lodhi, Appellate Tribunal.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1984 PLP 1520 (PLC(CS)) (KHAN MUHAMMAD Versus THF CHIEF CORPORATION OFFICER, MUNICIPAL). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Anwarul Hassan Khan 8hatti for Appellant.
- Date of hearing :19th April, 1982.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑S. 25‑A‑Reinstatement‑Workman retired on strength of medical report of Medical Superintendent that he was more than 60 years and suffering from Senial Debility ‑ No‑ counter‑medical certificate produced to show that he has not reached age of superannuation and that he was not suffering from disease as reported Retirement of workman, held, rightly ordered.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑S. 25‑A‑Reinstatement‑Workman retired on strength of medical report of Medical Superintendent that he was more than 60 years and suffering from Senial Debility ‑ No‑ counter‑medical certificate produced to show that he has not reached age of superannuation and that he was not suffering from disease as reported Retirement of workman, held, rightly ordered. Anwarul Hassan Khan 8hatti for Appellant. Date of hearing :19th April, 1982. This appeal arises from the decision, dated 28th February, 1982 passed by the Presiding Officer, Punjab Labour Court No. 9, Multan whereby the Grievance petition of the appellant was dismissed for his reinstatement.
2. The appellant was a Baildar and after serving for 30 years was retired on 4th May, 1980 on the strength of Medical Report of the Medical Superintendent which was to the effect that he was of the age of more than 60 years, that he was suffering from Senial Debility. No counter‑Medical Certificate was produced by the appellant to show that he has not yet reached the age of supperannuation and that he was not suffering from the disease as reported by the Medical Superintendent in his Certificate. In these circumstances the appellant was rightly retired and his grievance peti tion was rightly dismissed. There is no force in the appeal which is dismissed in limine. M. Y. M. Appeal dismissed.