CLC 1981

1981 PLP 9 (CLC)

MUHAMMAD SHAH NAWAZ‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD ABBAS‑Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Civil Revision No. 1574; Civil Miscellaneous Nos. 5961 and 5962 of 1980, decided on 29th September 1980.
Honorable Judges
Aamer Raza A. Khan, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1981 PLP 9 (CLC)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Aamer Raza A. Khan, J
Parties MUHAMMAD SHAH NAWAZ‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD ABBAS‑Respondent
Primary Law Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 9 (CLC)?

This judgment primarily cites: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 9 (CLC)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Aamer Raza A. Khan, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 9 (CLC) (MUHAMMAD SHAH NAWAZ‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD ABBAS‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑

Representation

  • M. Pervez Ahmad Butter for petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑ S. 24‑Transfer of civil cases‑Suit need not necessarily be transferred for disposal to another Court where case remanded for disposal Fact of finding or judgment of a subordinate Court being set aside by a superior Court, held, does not mean to incapacitate such subordinate Court from hearing and disposing of such suit on remand.‑[Remand of caseTransfer of civil cases]. Hafizur Rehman v. Shafiq Ahmad 1979 C L C 506 ; Mst. Paro v. Chajja Singh A I R 1934 Lah. 539 and Sita Ram v. Balak Ram A I R 1934 Oudh 154 distinguished.

Judgment & Decree

MUHAMMAD ABBAS‑Respondent Civil Revision No. 1574; Civil Miscellaneous Nos. 5961 and 5962 of 1980, decided on 29th September 1980. ‑‑ S. 24‑Transfer of civil cases‑Suit need not necessarily be transferred for disposal to another Court where case remanded for disposal Fact of finding or judgment of a subordinate Court being set aside by a superior Court, held, does not mean to incapacitate such subordinate Court from hearing and disposing of such suit on remand.‑[Remand of caseTransfer of civil cases]. Hafizur Rehman v. Shafiq Ahmad 1979 C L C 506 ; Mst. Paro v. Chajja Singh A I R 1934 Lah. 539 and Sita Ram v. Balak Ram A I R 1934 Oudh 154 distinguished. M. Pervez Ahmad Butter for petitioner.