1995SCMR338(1) (PLP)
ANAS MUHAMMAD and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus V.C.N.E.D UNIVERSITY, KARACHI‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1995SCMR338(1) (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Saleem Akhtar, Saiduzzaman Siddiqui and Wali Muhammad Khan, JJ |
| Parties | ANAS MUHAMMAD and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus V.C.N.E.D UNIVERSITY, KARACHI‑‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973). |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1995SCMR338(1) (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973). as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1995SCMR338(1) (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Saleem Akhtar, Saiduzzaman Siddiqui and Wali Muhammad Khan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1995SCMR338(1) (PLP) (ANAS MUHAMMAD and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus V.C.N.E.D UNIVERSITY, KARACHI‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- ‑‑‑Art. 184‑‑‑Counsel for petitioner stating before Supreme Court that matter in question having been patched up between the parties out of Court he would not press the case‑‑‑Case was disposed of according to the agreement of parties.
- M. Ismail Qureshi, Senior Advocate Supreme Court and SAA.Jafri. Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) for Petitioner (in both Cases).,
- Raja Abdul Ghafoor, Advocate Supreme Court for Respondent.
Judgment & Decree
Human Rights Cases Nos. 72 and 73 of 1994, decided on 24th April, 1994. ‑‑‑Art. 184‑‑‑Counsel for petitioner stating before Supreme Court that matter in question having been patched up between the parties out of Court he would not press the case‑‑‑Case was disposed of according to the agreement of parties. M. Ismail Qureshi, Senior Advocate Supreme Court and SAA.Jafri. Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) for Petitioner (in both Cases)., Raja Abdul Ghafoor, Advocate Supreme Court for Respondent. The learned counsel for the petitioners states that the matter has been patched up between the parties out of Court and as such he does not press the cases. Both the cases are disposed of accordingly. AA./A,‑1173/S Order accordingly.