1996SCMR1130(1) (PLP)
NASEER AHMED ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1996SCMR1130(1) (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Rafiq Tarar and Manzoor Hussain Sial, JJ |
| Parties | NASEER AHMED ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Peal Code (XLV of 1860)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1996SCMR1130(1) (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Peal Code (XLV of 1860)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1996SCMR1130(1) (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Muhammad Rafiq Tarar and Manzoor Hussain Sial, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1996SCMR1130(1) (PLP) (NASEER AHMED ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Afrasiab Khan, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing: 26th January, 1994.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment dated 13‑10‑1990 passed by the Lahore High Court, Lahore in Crl. Appeal No. 703/1988). ‑‑‑‑S. 302‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.185(3)‑‑‑Leave to appeal was granted to consider whether the eye‑witnesses were in a position to identify the assailant at mid‑night and whether the Courts below had correctly followed the principles governing appraisal of evidence as laid down by Supreme Court. Nemo for the State.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD RAFIQ TARAR, J.
Leave to appeal is granted to consider whether the eye-witnesses were in a position to identify the assailant at midnight and whether the Courts below had correctly followed the principles governing appraisal of evidence as laid down by this Court. N.H.Q./N-418/S Leave granted.