SCMR 1986

1986 PLP 78(2) (SCMR)

Present: Aslam Riaz Hussain Actg. C.J. and S.A. Nusrat, J Versus HABIB BANK Ltd.‑‑Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
Civil Miscellaneous Petition No. 356‑R of 1985, decided on 15th October, 1985.
Honorable Judges
Aslam Riaz Hussain Actg. C.J. and S.A. Nusrat, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1986 PLP 78(2) (SCMR)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members Aslam Riaz Hussain Actg. C.J. and S.A. Nusrat, J
Parties Present: Aslam Riaz Hussain Actg. C.J. and S.A. Nusrat, J Versus HABIB BANK Ltd.‑‑Respondent
Primary Law Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP 78(2) (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP 78(2) (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Aslam Riaz Hussain Actg. C.J. and S.A. Nusrat, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP 78(2) (SCMR) (Present: Aslam Riaz Hussain Actg. C.J. and S.A. Nusrat, J Versus HABIB BANK Ltd.‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑

Representation

  • Nemo for Respondent.
  • Raja Muhammad Anwar, Senior Advocate Supreme Court with Imtiaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for the Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑‑Art. 186‑A‑‑Supreme Court Rules, 1980,

0. V, r. 3‑‑Refusal to entertain petition under Art. 186‑A by Registrar of Supreme Court‑‑No exception, held, could be taken to same‑‑No ground made out for interference‑‑Petition dismissed. Raja Muhammad Anwar, Senior Advocate Supreme Court with Imtiaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for the Petitioner.

Judgment & Decree

‑‑‑Art. 186‑A‑‑Supreme Court Rules, 1980,

0. V, r. 3‑‑Refusal to entertain petition under Art. 186‑A by Registrar of Supreme Court‑‑No exception, held, could be taken to same‑‑No ground made out for interference‑‑Petition dismissed. Raja Muhammad Anwar, Senior Advocate Supreme Court with Imtiaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for the Petitioner. Nemo for Respondent. ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, ACTG. C.J.‑‑ The Registrar has rightly refused to entertain the petition under Article 186‑A of the Constitution. No ground is made out for interference in the order. Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Petition which is an appeal under Order V, rule 3 of this Court's rules is dismissed. M. Y. H. Petition dismissed.