2008 PLP 720 (CLC)
MUJTABA HASSAN — Petitioner Versus VICE-CHANCELLOR, BAHA-UD-DIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN and 4 others — Respondents
| Citation | 2008 PLP 720 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUJTABA HASSAN — Petitioner Versus VICE-CHANCELLOR, BAHA-UD-DIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN and 4 others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2008 PLP 720 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2008 PLP 720 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2008 PLP 720 (CLC) (MUJTABA HASSAN — Petitioner Versus VICE-CHANCELLOR, BAHA-UD-DIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN and 4 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Tahir Mahmood for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
Art. 199
Constitutional petition
Migration
Petitioner had urged that he being a student of University of Arid Agriculture, Rawalpindi, had applied for his migration to University College of Agriculture Baha-ud-Din Zakariya University Multan, but his migration was refused vide impugned order
Migration was regulated by the relevant rules of the institution to which the migration was required
Petitioner had no cogent answer to the question as to which of the rights of the petitioner had been infringed or which rule or the law had been violated, when his request for migration was declined by the authorities; except that if the seat was available, petitioner was entitled to migration, because he had right to get education at the place of his choice
No illegality having been pointed out in the impugned order, constitutional petition was dismissed.
Judgment & Decree
SAIF-UR-REHMAN, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has urged that the petitioner was a student of University of Arid Agriculture, Rawalpindi who applied for his migration to University College of Agriculture Baha-ud-Din Zakariya University, Multan after obtaining No Objection Certificate. In spite of the fact that the seats were available with respondents, his migration was refused vide order impugned through this petition.
2. Admittedly, the petitioner was a student of Arid University. The migration is regulated by the relevant rules of the Institution to which the migration is required. When inquired as to which of the rights of the petitioner had been infringed or which rule or the law had been violated when request for migration of the petitioner was declined by respondents, learned counsel had no cogent answer except that if the seat was available with respondents, the petitioner was entitled to migration because he had right to get education at the place of his choice.
3. I am afraid no interference can be caused in view of the said contention. Since no illegality could be pointed out in the impugned order therefore, this petition is dismissed. H.B.T./M-28/L Petition dismissed.