1981CLC1184 (PLP)
MUHAMMAD MUNSHI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus SHAHAMAND‑Respondent
| Citation | 1981CLC1184 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Ilyas, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD MUNSHI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus SHAHAMAND‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981CLC1184 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981CLC1184 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Ilyas, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1981CLC1184 (PLP) (MUHAMMAD MUNSHI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus SHAHAMAND‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Bashir Hussain Khalid for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
O. VIII, rr. 1, 9 & 10‑Decree‑Contention that there being no direction by trial Court under r. 9 of O. VIII for filing of written statement and written statement having been required to be filed by petitioner under r. 1 of O. VIII, Court could not decree suit under r. 10 of O. VIII for failure to file written statement on date fixed for purpose‑Trial Court, held, can decree suit under r. 10 of O. VIII,C. P. C. even if petitioner's default in matter of filing of written statement relatable to r. 1 and not r. 9 of O. VIII, C. P. C.‑[Nagaratnam Pillai v. Kamalathammal A I R 1945 Mad. 299 and Abdul Qadoos v. Abdur Rehman P L D 1970 Azad J & K 21 dissented from.‑‑[Plaint] Nagaratnam Pillai v. Ramalathammal A I R 1945 Mad. 299 and Abdul Qadoos v. Abdur Behman P L D 1970 Azad J & K 21 dissented from. Ghulam Muhammad v. Mst. Sahiban P L D 1957 Lah. 624 ; Sheikh Muhammad Sharif v. Hill Ghulam Gilani P L D 1961 Lah. 609 and Sh. Abdul Saboor & Brothers v. Ganesh Flour Mills Co. Ltd., Lyallpur P L D 1967 Lah. 779 ref.
Judgment & Decree
Civil Revision No. 404‑D and Civil Miscellaneous No. 1291/C of 1981, decided on 8th April, 1981. Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑
O. VIII, rr. 1, 9 & 10‑Decree‑Contention that there being no direction by trial Court under r. 9 of O. VIII for filing of written statement and written statement having been required to be filed by petitioner under r. 1 of O. VIII, Court could not decree suit under r. 10 of O. VIII for failure to file written statement on date fixed for purpose‑Trial Court, held, can decree suit under r. 10 of O. VIII,C. P. C. even if petitioner's default in matter of filing of written statement relatable to r. 1 and not r. 9 of O. VIII, C. P. C.‑[Nagaratnam Pillai v. Kamalathammal A I R 1945 Mad. 299 and Abdul Qadoos v. Abdur Rehman P L D 1970 Azad J & K 21 dissented from.‑‑[Plaint] Nagaratnam Pillai v. Ramalathammal A I R 1945 Mad. 299 and Abdul Qadoos v. Abdur Behman P L D 1970 Azad J & K 21 dissented from. Ghulam Muhammad v. Mst. Sahiban P L D 1957 Lah. 624 ; Sheikh Muhammad Sharif v. Hill Ghulam Gilani P L D 1961 Lah. 609 and Sh. Abdul Saboor & Brothers v. Ganesh Flour Mills Co. Ltd., Lyallpur P L D 1967 Lah. 779 ref. Bashir Hussain Khalid for Petitioner.