2007 PLP 34 (CLC)
Mian MUHAMMAD RASHID — Petitioner Versus BAHAUDDIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN through Vice-Chancellor and another — Respondents
| Citation | 2007 PLP 34 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | Mian MUHAMMAD RASHID — Petitioner Versus BAHAUDDIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN through Vice-Chancellor and another — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Educational institution |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2007 PLP 34 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: Educational institution as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2007 PLP 34 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2007 PLP 34 (CLC) (Mian MUHAMMAD RASHID — Petitioner Versus BAHAUDDIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN through Vice-Chancellor and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Abdul Ghani for Petitioner.
- Muhammad Qasim Khan, A.A.-G. for Respondent.
Headnotes / Summary
Re-evaluation of answer book
Candidate had sought re-evaluation of his B.A. Examination Paper "B" (Answer book) contending that two questions in said paper had not been correctly evaluated
No provision being in the University Statutes for re-evaluation of the answer book, candidate was rightly denied re-evaluation of his answer book
Candidate applied for rechecking of paper which had already been done.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD SAYEED AKHTAR, J.
Seeks re-evaluation of his B.A. Education Paper "B" answer book. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that questions Nos.5 and 9 have not been correctly evaluated. It is admitted by the learned counsel that there is no provision in the University Statutes for re-evaluation of the answer book. He applied for rechecking and the same has already been done.
2. Since there is no provision in the University Statute for re-evaluation of the answer book of the petitioner, therefore, this petition is dismissed in limine. H.B.T./M-575/L Petition dismissed.