SCMR 1998

1998 PLP 434 (SCMR)

SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB‑‑‑Petitioner Versus BASHIR AKHTAR SAHI‑‑‑Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Decided Date
N/A
Honorable Judges
Zia Mahmood Mirza and Khalil‑ur‑Rehman Khan, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1998 PLP 434 (SCMR)
Forum / Court Supreme Court of Pakistan
Bench Members Zia Mahmood Mirza and Khalil‑ur‑Rehman Khan, JJ
Parties SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB‑‑‑Petitioner Versus BASHIR AKHTAR SAHI‑‑‑Respondent
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1998 PLP 434 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1998 PLP 434 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Zia Mahmood Mirza and Khalil‑ur‑Rehman Khan, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1998 PLP 434 (SCMR) (SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB‑‑‑Petitioner Versus BASHIR AKHTAR SAHI‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • Muhammad Anwar Ghuman, Advocate Supreme Court and Rao Muhammad Yusuf Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
  • Maqbool Ilahi Malik, Advocate Supreme Court and Mahmoodul Islam, Advocate-on-Record for Respondent.

Judgment & Decree

ZIA MAHMOOD MIRZA, J.

This petition is directed against an interim order passed by the Service Tribunal on 5-12-1996 whereby operation of the Order, dated 22-8-1996 impugned before the Tribunal was suspended. The order of the Tribunal was subject to notice and the next date of hearing was fixed on 14-1-1997. We have asked the learned counsel as to what orders were passed by the Tribunal on 14-1-1997. He is unable to make any statement. Learned counsel appearing for the caveator, however, points out that no one for the Government appeared before the Tribunal on 14-1-1997. That being so, petitioner should better approach the Service Tribunal and seek the recall of the interim order. With this observation, this petition is dismissed. A.A./S-100/S Petition dismissed