SCMR 1994

1994 PLP 1674 (SCMR)

SHAHID MAQBOOL‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE ‑‑‑ Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Decided Date
N/A
Honorable Judges
Shafiur Rahman and Saad Saood Jan, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1994 PLP 1674 (SCMR)
Forum / Court Supreme Court of Pakistan
Bench Members Shafiur Rahman and Saad Saood Jan, JJ
Parties SHAHID MAQBOOL‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE ‑‑‑ Respondent
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 PLP 1674 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 PLP 1674 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Shafiur Rahman and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 PLP 1674 (SCMR) (SHAHID MAQBOOL‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE ‑‑‑ Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • Asghar Ali, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Mehdi Khan Mehtab, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.

Judgment & Decree

SHAFIUR RAHMAN, J.‑‑‑The petitioner is accused of offence under sections 10 and 11 of the Ordinance, VII of 1979. He has been refused bail by two Courts. The High Court observed as hereunder:‑ "Admittedly, the abductee seems to be of tender age. She levelled allegation of Zina‑bil‑Jabr against the petitioner in her statement under section 164, Cr.P.C. During crossexamination, no suggestion was put to her whether she entered into Nikah with the petitioner and put her signatures on the Nikahnama or not; over and above this, neither the alleged Nikahnama was produced before the police nor witnesses of the Nikah were examined in defence by the petitioner." No ground made out for interfering with this discretionary order. Leave to appeal is refused. N.II.Q/S‑861/S Leave refused.