1969 PLP (1) (SCMR)
FEROZ SHAH AND 2 OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus MANZOOR HUSSAIN SHAH AND 84 OTHERS Respondents
| Citation | 1969 PLP (1) (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Fazle‑Akbar, C. J., Sajjad Ahmad and Abdus Sattar, JJ |
| Parties | FEROZ SHAH AND 2 OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus MANZOOR HUSSAIN SHAH AND 84 OTHERS Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1962) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1969 PLP (1) (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1962) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1969 PLP (1) (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Fazle‑Akbar, C. J., Sajjad Ahmad and Abdus Sattar, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1969 PLP (1) (SCMR) (FEROZ SHAH AND 2 OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus MANZOOR HUSSAIN SHAH AND 84 OTHERS Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Peer Bakhsh Khan, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Muhammad Tariq Khan, Attorney for Petitioners.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing : 24th October 1968.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Peshawar Bench, Peshawar, dated the 10th March 1968, in Review Petition No. 47 of 1968/Regular Second Appeal No. 375 of 1967).
Art. 58(3)‑Appeal under Cl. 10, Letters Patent (Lahore) competent but petitioner stead straightway filing, Petition for Special Leave to Appeal‑Petition not entertained and returned to petitioner.
Judgment & Decree
Art. 58(3)‑Appeal under Cl. 10, Letters Patent (Lahore) competent but petitioner stead straightway filing, Petition for Special Leave to Appeal‑Petition not entertained and returned to petitioner. Peer Bakhsh Khan, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Muhammad Tariq Khan, Attorney for Petitioners. Nemo for Respondents. Date of hearing : 24th October 1968. FAZLE‑AKBAR, C. J.‑Special leave to appeal is sought against the judgment passed in Regular Second Appeal No. 375 of 1967 by the High Court of West Pakistan at Peshawar and also against the order dismissing a petition which was filed for review of the said judgment. The petitioners, instead of asking for a certificate from the High Court under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent, have straight way filed this petition for special leave to appeal. We, therefore, direct that this petition may be returned to the Attorney concerned. Order accordingly.