1988 PLP 1972 (SCMR)
ABDUL HAMEED — Petitioner Versus THE COMMISSIONER, BAHAWALPUR DIVISION
| Citation | 1988 PLP 1972 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Ghulan Mujaddid Mirza and Saad Saood Jan, JJ |
| Parties | ABDUL HAMEED — Petitioner Versus THE COMMISSIONER, BAHAWALPUR DIVISION |
| Primary Law | Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1988 PLP 1972 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1988 PLP 1972 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Ghulan Mujaddid Mirza and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1988 PLP 1972 (SCMR) (ABDUL HAMEED — Petitioner Versus THE COMMISSIONER, BAHAWALPUR DIVISION). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch.Mushtaq Masood, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch.Mehdi Khan Mehtab, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 17th July, 1988.
- Ch.Mushtaq Masood, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch.Mehdi Khan Mehtab, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
(From the judgment of Punjab Service Tribunal dated 14-12-1981 in Appeal No.182/1046 of 1981).
S.4 -Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 212(3)--Dismissal of appeal by Service Tribunal, challenged--Procedure adopted by departmental authority fully in accordance with law and no violation of any positive Rules committed--No. legal flaw found in impugned judgment and no ground for leave to appeal made out--Petition dismissed.
Judgment & Decree
GHULAM MUJADDID MIRZA, J.‑‑Abdul Hameed ex‑Patwari Rahimyar Khan Circle, Tehsil Sadiqabad, District Rahimyar Khan at present resident of Khairpur Tameewali, District Bahawalpur seeks leave to appeal against the judgment of the Punjab Service Tribunal dated 14‑12‑1981 whereby his appeal against the order of the respondents was dismissed. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner who tried to find out some legal flaw in the impugned judgment but could not do so. On the other hand we agree with the following observation of the Tribunal:‑
"In the light of the above discussions we are of the considered opinion that the procedure adopted by the A.C. was fully in accordance with the law and no violation of any positive rules has been committed." No ground for leave to appeal is made out. M.I./A‑320/5 Petition dismissed.