SCMR 1986

1986 PLP 136(1) (SCMR)

ADIL SHER‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
Criminal Petition No. 10‑P of 1985, decided on 8th October, 1985.
Honorable Judges
Aslam Riaz Hussain, Actg. C. J., Nasim Hasan Shah and S.A. Nusrat, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1986 PLP 136(1) (SCMR)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members Aslam Riaz Hussain, Actg. C. J., Nasim Hasan Shah and S.A. Nusrat, JJ
Parties ADIL SHER‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE Respondent
Primary Law Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑ ‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP 136(1) (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑ ‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP 136(1) (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Aslam Riaz Hussain, Actg. C. J., Nasim Hasan Shah and S.A. Nusrat, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP 136(1) (SCMR) (ADIL SHER‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑ ‑

Representation

  • Muhammad Shafiq, Advocate Supreme Court and M. Qasim Imam, Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Petition for leave to appeal‑‑Limitation‑‑No plausible explanation given for condoning delay in filing petition‑‑Petition dismissed as barred by time. Nemo for the State.

Judgment & Decree

ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, ACTG. C.J.‑‑This petition is barred b 34 days. No plausible explanation has been given for condoning the delay in filing the petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as barred by time. M . Y . H . Petition dismissed.