SCMR 1968

1968 PLP (1) (SCMR)

ABDUL HAMID‑Petitioner Versus ASGHAR ALI AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
Criminal Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 109 of 1968, decided on 27th June 1968.
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1968 PLP (1) (SCMR)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members N/A
Parties ABDUL HAMID‑Petitioner Versus ASGHAR ALI AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Primary Law Constitution of Pakistan (1962)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1968 PLP (1) (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1962) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1968 PLP (1) (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1968 PLP (1) (SCMR) (ABDUL HAMID‑Petitioner Versus ASGHAR ALI AND OTHERS‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Constitution of Pakistan (1962)

Representation

  • Rafiq Qureshi, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by S. Wajid Hussain, Senior Attorney for Petitioner.
  • Nemo for Respondents.
  • Date of hearing : 27th June 1968.

Headnotes / Summary

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Lahore, dated the 11th January 1968, in Criminal Appeal No. 294 of 1967).

Art. 58 (3) and Supreme Court Rules, 1956, O. XIII, r. 1‑Petition barred by 53 days‑Explanation that petitioner was not informed of judgment of High Court within tithe‑Held: not satisfactory‑Petition dismissed as barred by time. JUDGMENT FAZLE‑AKBAR, C. J.‑‑This petition is barred, by time by 53 days. The explanation that as the petitioner was not informed of the judgment of the High Court, he could not move this petition in time, is not considered at all satisfactory. This petition is, therefore, dismissed as time‑barred. Petition dismissed.

Judgment & Decree

FAZLE‑AKBAR, C. J.‑‑This petition is barred, by time by 53 days. The explanation that as the petitioner was not informed of the judgment of the High Court, he could not move this petition in time, is not considered at all satisfactory. This petition is, therefore, dismissed as time‑barred. Petition dismissed.