1995SCMR1165 (PLP)
Mst. NAVEED ARSHAD‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1995SCMR1165 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Rafiq Tarar and Fazal Karim, JJ |
| Parties | Mst. NAVEED ARSHAD‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1995SCMR1165 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1995SCMR1165 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Muhammad Rafiq Tarar and Fazal Karim, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1995SCMR1165 (PLP) (Mst. NAVEED ARSHAD‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Khawaja Sultan Ahmad, Senior Advocate Supreme Court instructed by S. Abul Aasim Jafri, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing: 15th August, 1994.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment of the Lahore High Court, Lahore dated 5‑7‑1994 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 2466/B of 1994). ‑‑‑‑S. 497‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)‑‑‑Bail‑‑‑Leave to appeal was granted inter alia to consider the contention that the accused was an ailing and aged lady and the material collected by, the Investigating Agency prima facie did not link her with the commission of offences with which she had been charged. Nemo for the State.
Judgment & Decree
(On appeal from the judgment of the Lahore High Court, Lahore dated 5‑7‑1994 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 2466/B of 1994). ‑‑‑‑S. 497‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)‑‑‑Bail‑‑‑Leave to appeal was granted inter alia to consider the contention that the accused was an ailing and aged lady and the material collected by, the Investigating Agency prima facie did not link her with the commission of offences with which she had been charged. Khawaja Sultan Ahmad, Senior Advocate Supreme Court instructed by S. Abul Aasim Jafri, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner. Nemo for the State. Date of hearing: 15th August, 1994. MUHAMMAD RAFIQ TARAR, J.‑‑‑Leave to appeal is granted inter alia to consider the contention that the petitioner is an ailing and aged lady and the material collected by the Investigating Agency prima facie does not link her with the commission of offences with which she has been charged. Interim bail to continue. N.H.Q./N‑402/S Leave granted.