1975 PLP 87 (SCMR)
MUHAMMAD NASEER-Petitioner Versus Hakim DOST MUHAMMAD AND 2 OTHERS-Respondents
| Citation | 1975 PLP 87 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | (a) Settlement Scheme No. VII Reconstituted- |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD NASEER-Petitioner Versus Hakim DOST MUHAMMAD AND 2 OTHERS-Respondents |
| Primary Law | (a) Settlement Scheme No. VII [Reconstituted], (b) Supreme Court Rules, 1956 |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1975 PLP 87 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: (a) Settlement Scheme No. VII [Reconstituted], (b) Supreme Court Rules, 1956 as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1975 PLP 87 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the (a) Settlement Scheme No. VII Reconstituted- bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1975 PLP 87 (SCMR) (MUHAMMAD NASEER-Petitioner Versus Hakim DOST MUHAMMAD AND 2 OTHERS-Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Abdul Majeed Khan, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Sh. Abdul Karim, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing : 30th May 1974.
- Abdul Majeed Khan, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Sh. Abdul Karim, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
(On review from the judgment and order of the Supreme Court dated the 11th October 1973, in Civil Appeal No. 224 of 19.'3). -- Transfer of shop-Person obtaining transfer of a shop-Barred from getting another shop transferred in his favour. -- O. XXVI-Review-View of Court being wrong-No ground for review of order.
Judgment & Decree
WAHEEDUDDIN AHMAD, J.‑This is an application for review of our order dated the 11th October, 1973. The only contention raised by the petitioner is that the view taken by us in that order that Settlement Scheme No. VII is subject to Settlement Scheme No. I, is erroneous. This contention has no force. As has been mentioned in the said order, according to the reconstituted Scheme No. 7, the property is to be transferred in accordance with the provisions of the Act and the Settlement Scheme. Under the Settlement Scheme, there is a clear bar for getting the transfer of a shop if a person has obtained transfer of another shop. In any case, even if our view is wrong that is no ground to review our order. The petition is dismissed. Petition dismissed.