1996 P Cr (PLP)
MUHAMMAD SHAFIQ Applicant Versus THE STATE Respondent
| Citation | 1996 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Munawar Ali Khan, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD SHAFIQ Applicant Versus THE STATE Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1996 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1996 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Munawar Ali Khan, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1996 P Cr (PLP) (MUHAMMAD SHAFIQ Applicant Versus THE STATE Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.307.134‑‑Bail, grant of Accused alleged to have held victim‑‑No injury assigned to accused‑‑Bail was granted in circumstances. Raja Muhammad Aslam Kiyani for Applicant. Abdul Ghafoor, Addl. A.‑G. for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Bail Application No. 289 of 1986, decided on 10th March, 1986. ‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.307.134‑‑Bail, grant of Accused alleged to have held victim‑‑No injury assigned to accused‑‑Bail was granted in circumstances. Raja Muhammad Aslam Kiyani for Applicant. Abdul Ghafoor, Addl. A.‑G. for the State. The applicant Muhammad Shafiq and co‑accused Nafees Gul have been challaned under section 307134, P.P.C. The co‑accused is still at large. The prosecution case is that applicant caught hold of the complainant Khursheed whereas co‑accused Nafees Gul inflicted two knife injuries to him on his chest. The contention of learner: counsel for the applicant is that the injuries have not been attributed to the applicant and the only role assigned to him is of having seized the complainant. There are many authorities including those of Supreme Court on the point that if the accused is alleged to have only held the victim at the time of injuries being caused to him by other co‑accused, he has invariably been granted bail The learned Additional Advocate‑General has no objection to grant of bail. For above reasons, bail is granted to the applicant in the sum of Rs.30,000 (Rupees Thirty Thousand only) and P.R. of the same amount to the satisfaction of trial Court. S.A. Bail granted.