2005 PLP 3207 (YLR)
HAKIM ALI alias SONO — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2005 PLP 3207 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Rahmat Hussain Jafferi, J |
| Parties | HAKIM ALI alias SONO — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2005 PLP 3207 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2005 PLP 3207 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Rahmat Hussain Jafferi, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2005 PLP 3207 (YLR) (HAKIM ALI alias SONO — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.395
Name of accused was mentioned in F.I.R. and encounter had taken place between police. and dacoits
Robbed vehicle was secured and accused was found sitting in said vehicle and a pistol was also secured from his possession
All prosecution witnesses had fully supported case against accused
Reasonable grounds existing for believing that accused was involved in the case, he was not entitled to concession of bail
Bail application was dismissed. Ghulam Muhammad Khan Durrani for Applicant. Muhammad Mahmood S. Khan Yousifi, A.A.-G. for the State.
Judgment & Decree
RAHMAT HUSSAIN JAFFERI, J.
On 18-7-2003 the complainant Inspector Karim Dino of Police Station, Kandhra received spy information that the robbed vehicle of Crime No.53 of 2003 would be passing near Sim Nali therefore the complainant along with his subordinate staff reached abandoned Kot at Sim Nali where at 9 p.m. they found 8/9 dacoits in the robbed vehicles. There was encounter between the dacoits sitting in the Vehicles and the police which continued for some time. Thereafter some of the dacoits ran away. Two dacoits were arrested; one of them was the present applicant Hakim Ali alias Sono who was armed with pistol. The robbed Vehicle was secured. The Police brought the vehicle and the accused at the Police Station, where the F.I.R. was lodged. The applicant moved a bail application before the trial Court but the same was dismissed, hence this application. Learned counsel for the applicant simply argued that the applicant has remained in jail from July, 2003 and the Court is lying vacant. He has further stated that the applicant has been involved due to enmity. The learned A.A.-G. opposed to the grant of bail on the ground that the applicant was apprehended at the spot and the robbed vehicle was secured from his possession. I have given due consideration to the arguments and found that the name of the applicant is mentioned in the F.I.R. There was encounter between police and dacoits. Thereafter the robbed vehicle was secured. The applicant was sitting in the said vehicle. A pistol was also secured from his possession. All the P. Ws. have fully supported the case as such there are reasonable grounds for believing that the applicant is involved in the case. Hence he is not entitled to the concession of bail. The bail application is dismissed. H.B.T./H-59/K Bail refused.