1985 PLP 306 (MLD)
Mst. GHULAM SAKINA — Petitioner Versus KHALID MASOOD AKHTAR NIAZI — Respondent
| Citation | 1985 PLP 306 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Single Bench |
| Parties | Mst. GHULAM SAKINA — Petitioner Versus KHALID MASOOD AKHTAR NIAZI — Respondent |
| Primary Law | West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1985 PLP 306 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1985 PLP 306 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Honorable Judges.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1985 PLP 306 (MLD) (Mst. GHULAM SAKINA — Petitioner Versus KHALID MASOOD AKHTAR NIAZI — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- M.A. Zafar for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 25-A--Transfer of family suit--Application for--Suit for dissolution of marriage by wife pending in Court at T--husband's suit for restitution of conjugal rights pending in Court at L--Transfer application by wife for transfer of case of husband and consolidating same with suit for dissolution filed by wife pending in Court at T--Wife's suit for dissolution decreed during pendency of such app4catiori--Question of consolidation of decreed suit of wife and husband's suit for restitution of conjugal rights pending in Family Court at L, held, would not arise in view of husband's suit becoming infructuous after passing of decree in suit for dissolution of marriage--Transfer application was not pressed by applicant and thus disposed of as having been withdrawn in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the suit for dissolution of marriage filed by the petitioner had been decreed by the Family Court, Talagang on 12-7-1984. The question of consolidation of the aforementioned suit and respondent's suit for restitution of conjugal rights pending in the Family Court, Lahore, would not arise under the circumstances. As a matter of fact the respondent's suit has become infructuous after the passing of the decree in the petitioner's suit for dissolution of marriage. The petitioner does not want to pursue this petition. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the transfer application stands disposed of having been withdrawn. A.A. Application withdrawn.