1986 PLP 180 (SCMR)
PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Education and others‑‑Petitioners Versus ABDUL RASHID QAYYUM and others‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1986 PLP 180 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Aslam Riaz Hussain, Actg. C.J., Abdul Kadir Shaikh and S. A. Nusrat, JJ |
| Parties | PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Education and others‑‑Petitioners Versus ABDUL RASHID QAYYUM and others‑‑Respondents |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP 180 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP 180 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Aslam Riaz Hussain, Actg. C.J., Abdul Kadir Shaikh and S. A. Nusrat, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP 180 (SCMR) (PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Education and others‑‑Petitioners Versus ABDUL RASHID QAYYUM and others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Khalil Ramday, Assistant Advocate‑General assisted by S. Abid Nawaz, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners (in all Petitions).
- Ch. Muhammad Asghar, Advocate Supreme Court assisted by M.A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents Nos. 1, 19, 20, 21, 28, 30 (in Civil Petition No. 819 of 1982).
- Muhammad Aslam, Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) for Respondents (in Civil Petition No. 820 of 1982).
- Muhammad Aslam, Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) for Respondents (in Civil Petition No. 822 of 1982).
- S.A. NUSRAT, J.‑‑Mr. Khalil Ramday, Assistant Advocate General, stated that the Government of Punjab has finally decided the cases of the respondents on 1‑8‑1985, which order has been challenged by the respondents in appeal before the Punjab Service Tribunal. In the circumstances he sought permission to withdraw the petitions without prejudice to the right of the Government to contest the appeals on the pleas raised in these petitions as well as such pleas as may be raised before the Service Tribunal notwithstanding the observation of the learned Tribunal made in the order dated 16‑8‑1982 which was impugned in these petitions. The request is reasonable and granted. The petitions are, therefore, dismissed as withdrawn.
Judgment & Decree
S.A. NUSRAT, J.‑‑Mr. Khalil Ramday, Assistant Advocate General, stated that the Government of Punjab has finally decided the cases of the respondents on 1‑8‑1985, which order has been challenged by the respondents in appeal before the Punjab Service Tribunal. In the circumstances he sought permission to withdraw the petitions without prejudice to the right of the Government to contest the appeals on the pleas raised in these petitions as well as such pleas as may be raised before the Service Tribunal notwithstanding the observation of the learned Tribunal made in the order dated 16‑8‑1982 which was impugned in these petitions. The request is reasonable and granted. The petitions are, therefore, dismissed as withdrawn. M . Y . H . Petitions dismissed.