1989 PLP 664 (SCMR)
JAN MUHAMMAD — Petitioner Versus Mst. BASHIRAN BEGUM — Respondent
| Citation | 1989 PLP 664 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Nasim Hasan Shah, Ghulam Mujaddid and Usman Ali Shah, JJ |
| Parties | JAN MUHAMMAD — Petitioner Versus Mst. BASHIRAN BEGUM — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Sind Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 664 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Sind Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 664 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Nasim Hasan Shah, Ghulam Mujaddid and Usman Ali Shah, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 664 (SCMR) (JAN MUHAMMAD — Petitioner Versus Mst. BASHIRAN BEGUM — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ahmadullah Faruqi, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondent.
- Date of hearing: 12th December, 1988.
- Ahmadullah Faruqi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- We have heard Mr. Ahmadullah Faruqi, learned Advocate‑on‑Record for the petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment dated 17-4-88 of the High Court of Sind, Karachi in First Rent Appeal No.145 of 1987). -S.15--Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)--Ejectment--No error of law or procedure having been committed by Courts below which could justify interference, had been pointed out--Landlady's plea for her personal use had been found established by Courts below--Question involved in appeal being one of fact and two Courts below having concurrently found the same against petitioner, leave to appeal was refused.
Judgment & Decree
Sind Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979)‑‑ ‑S.15‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)‑‑Ejectment‑‑No error of law or procedure having been committed by Courts below which could justify interference, had been pointed out‑‑Landlady's plea for her personal use had been found established by Courts below‑‑Question involved in appeal being one of fact and two Courts below having concurrently found the same against petitioner, leave to appeal was refused. Ahmadullah Faruqi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner. Nemo for Respondent. Date of hearing: 12th December, 1988. NAS1M HASAN SHAH, J.‑‑The petitioner has been ordered by the Rent Controller to vacate the premises‑in dispute and hand over its possession to the landlady (Mst. Bashiran Begum 'respondent herein) in pursuance of the application submitted by the latter under Section 15 of the Sind Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979. The First Regular Appeal filed by the petitioner before the Sind High Court having failed, hence this petition for leave. We have heard Mr. Ahmadullah Faruqi, learned Advocate‑on‑Record for the petitioner. No error of law or procedure having been committed by the Courts below, which could justify interference by this Court, has been pointed out. The I landlady alleged that she needed the premises for her personal use. The Courts below have found that she has established the said allegation. The question IA involved is one of fact and the two Courts below have concurrently found it against the petitioner. AA./J‑39/S Petition dismissed.