SCMR 1989

1989 PLP 1821 (SCMR)

ZIA‑UL‑ISLAM Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 88‑K of 1988, decided on 7th September, 1988.
Honorable Judges
Abdul Kadir Sheikh arid Shafiur Rehman, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1989 PLP 1821 (SCMR)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members Abdul Kadir Sheikh arid Shafiur Rehman, JJ
Parties ZIA‑UL‑ISLAM Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Primary Law Customs Act (IV of 1969)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 1821 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Customs Act (IV of 1969) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 1821 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Abdul Kadir Sheikh arid Shafiur Rehman, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 1821 (SCMR) (ZIA‑UL‑ISLAM Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Customs Act (IV of 1969)

Representation

  • Faizanul Haq, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
  • Date of hearing: 7th September, 1988.

Headnotes / Summary

(From the order of Sind High Court, Karachi, dated 21‑7‑1988 in Cr. Bail Application No. 79 of 1988). ‑‑‑Ss. 156 (1) & 178‑‑Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 497‑‑Bail refused by High Court‑‑No exception in law or facts could be taken with the judgment of High Court‑‑Petition for leave to appeal refused. Nemo for the State.

Judgment & Decree

ABDUL KADIR SHAIKH, J.‑‑This is a petition for leave to appeal from the Order of a learned .fudge of Sind High Court dismissing petitioner's application for grant of bail pending his trial under Section 2(a) and Clause 8 of Section 156(11 read with Section 178 of the Customs Act, 1969. After having heard the learned counsel in the light of the record before us we find that no exception in law or on facts can be taken with the impugned Judgment of the High Court. The petition is therefore dismissed. A.A./Z‑08/S Bail refused.