1981 PLP 1710 (CLC)
ABDUL AZIZ‑‑Petitioner Versus Rana REHMAT ALI KHAN AND OTHERS‑Respondents
| Citation | 1981 PLP 1710 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Munzoor Hussain Sial, J |
| Parties | ABDUL AZIZ‑‑Petitioner Versus Rana REHMAT ALI KHAN AND OTHERS‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 1710 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 1710 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Munzoor Hussain Sial, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 1710 (CLC) (ABDUL AZIZ‑‑Petitioner Versus Rana REHMAT ALI KHAN AND OTHERS‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Munir A. Sheikh for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents Nos. 1 to 3 and 5.
- Iqbal Ahmad Malik for Respondents No. 4.
- Date of hearing : 18th February, 1980.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑Art. 199 read with Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act: (XXVIII of 1958), para. 24 of Schedule‑Writ --Transfer price of property in dispute reduced by respondent before issuance of notice for resumption ‑Service of notice upon defaulting transferee a condition precedent for assumption of property and notice itself invalid even if served upon petitioner did not authorize respondent to cancel transfer and property in dispute not available for disposal under Settlement Scheme No. VIII‑Cancellation of order, held, based on erroneous, assumption of valid service of notice upon petitioner‑‑Writ allowed, in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
Writ Petition No. 400‑R of 1974, decided on 18th February, 1980. ‑‑Art. 199 read with Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act: (XXVIII of 1958), para. 24 of Schedule‑Writ --Transfer price of property in dispute reduced by respondent before issuance of notice for resumption ‑Service of notice upon defaulting transferee a condition precedent for assumption of property and notice itself invalid even if served upon petitioner did not authorize respondent to cancel transfer and property in dispute not available for disposal under Settlement Scheme No. VIII‑Cancellation of order, held, based on erroneous, assumption of valid service of notice upon petitioner‑‑Writ allowed, in circumstances. Munir A. Sheikh for Petitioner. Nemo for Respondents Nos. 1 to 3 and
5. Iqbal Ahmad Malik for Respondents No.