1987 PLP 1755 (SCMR)
PROVINCE OF BALUCHISTAN through Secretary, C & W Department, Quetta‑‑ Appellant Versus ABDUL REHMAN‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1987 PLP 1755 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Abdul Kadir Shaikh, S.A. Nusrat and‑Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ |
| Parties | PROVINCE OF BALUCHISTAN through Secretary, C & W Department, Quetta‑‑ Appellant Versus ABDUL REHMAN‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Supreme Court Rules, 1980‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 PLP 1755 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Supreme Court Rules, 1980‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 PLP 1755 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Abdul Kadir Shaikh, S.A. Nusrat and‑Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 PLP 1755 (SCMR) (PROVINCE OF BALUCHISTAN through Secretary, C & W Department, Quetta‑‑ Appellant Versus ABDUL REHMAN‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Yakub K. Eusufzai, A.‑G. and Iftikhar Muhammad, Advocate- on‑Record for Appellant.
- Basharatullah, Advocate Supreme Court and S.A.M. Quadri. Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent.
- Date of hearing: 15th April, 1987.
- Learned Advocate‑General who appears for the appellant requests for grant of permission to withdraw the appeal.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑O. XXXIII, R.6‑‑Appeal before Supreme Court‑‑Withdrawal of‑ Appellant seeking permission to withdraw appeal and respondent having no objection‑‑Appeal dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑O. XXXIII, R.6‑‑Appeal before Supreme Court‑‑Withdrawal of‑ Appellant seeking permission to withdraw appeal and respondent having no objection‑‑Appeal dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. Yakub K. Eusufzai, A.‑G. and Iftikhar Muhammad, Advocate- on‑Record for Appellant. Basharatullah, Advocate Supreme Court and S.A.M. Quadri. Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent. Date of hearing: 15th April, 1987. Learned Advocate‑General who appears for the appellant requests for grant of permission to withdraw the appeal. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed as withdrawn and no order as to costs. M.I/P‑18/S. Order accordingly.