1987 PLP 687 (SCMR)
MUHAMMAD IQBAL BUTT‑‑Petitioner Versus THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR FOOD, LAHORE REGION, LAHORE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1987 PLP 687 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Javid Iqbal, JJ |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD IQBAL BUTT‑‑Petitioner Versus THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR FOOD, LAHORE REGION, LAHORE‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 PLP 687 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 PLP 687 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Javid Iqbal, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 PLP 687 (SCMR) (MUHAMMAD IQBAL BUTT‑‑Petitioner Versus THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR FOOD, LAHORE REGION, LAHORE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Shafiqul Islam, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Mian Attaur Rehman, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Faiz Muhammad Bhatti, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Rao Muhammad Yousuf Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Punjab Service Tribunal, Lahore dated 15th November, 1982 in Appeal No.77/940 of 1981). ‑‑‑Art. 212(3)‑‑Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974),S.4‑‑Appeal‑‑Limitation‑‑Appeal not filed within 30 days after awaiting for order of appellate authority for 90 days dismissed by Tribunal as time‑barred‑‑Such interpretation having already been accepted by Supreme Court in two previous judgments, same could not be reviewed‑ Petition for leave to appeal, .held, was without substance and dismissed. Ahmad Ali Memon v. Government of Sind 1980 S C M R 260 and Haji Qadir Bakhsh v. Government of Sind 1982 S C M R 582 ref.
Judgment & Decree
Ahmad Ali Memon v. Government of Sind 1980 S C M R 260 and Haji Qadir Bakhsh v. Government of Sind 1982 S C M R 582 ref. Shafiqul Islam, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Mian Attaur Rehman, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner. Faiz Muhammad Bhatti, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Rao Muhammad Yousuf Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent. Date of hearing: 19th January, 1987. JAVID IQBAL, J.‑‑Leave to appeal is being sought against the judgment dated 15th November, 1982 of the Punjab Service Tribunal Lahore whereby the appeal of the petitioner was dismissed as time‑barred. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was served with a charge‑sheet by the Deputy Director, Food, Lahore on the allegation that while he was working as Foodgrain Inspector at PR Centre, Chuharkana he misappropriated Government stocks and stores causing considerable monetary loss to the Government. The petitioner submitted reply to the charge‑sheet. The matter was inquired into by the Inquiry Officer who submitted his report to the authorised officer holding that the petitioner was responsible for the loss caused. The authorised officer then issued notice to him to show cause as to why the amount of loss caused should not be recovered from him. He submitted his reply and was also personally heard, but the authorised officer was not satisfied with his explanation and decided against him. The petitioner appealed against the order of the authorised officer dated 4th October, 1979 whereby it was ordered to recover the amount of about Rupees forty thousand plus from the petitioner. The petitioner then filed an appeal against the said order before the Director of Food, Punjab on 13th October, 1979 but that appeal was not disposed of. Therefore, he filed an appeal before the Punjab Service Tribunal Lahore on 8th February, 1981. This appeal was dismissed as barred by time in view of the judgments of the Supreme Court of Pakistan titled Ahmad Ali Memon v. Government of Sind 1980 S C M R 260 and Haji Qadir Bakhsh v. Government of Sind 1982 S C M R
582. On the basis of these judgments the petitioner could have awaited the order of the appellate authority to the extent of 90 days and then he should have filed an appeal under section 4 of the Punjab Service Tribunal Act within 30 days after the expiry of the aforesaid period of 90 days, but the petitioner did not do so. Therefore, the Punjab Service Tribunal relying on the aforesaid judgments of the Supreme Court had dismissed his appeal as time‑barred. Learned counsel for the petitioner attempted to argue that we should reconsider the principle laid down in the aforesaid judgments but since this interpretation of law has already been accepted by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid judgments we are not inclined to review the same. The result is that there is no substance in this petition which is accordingly dismissed. S. Q./M‑32/S Petition dismissed.