PLC(CS) 1980

1980 PLP (C (PLC(CS))

MUHAMMAD FAROOQ AHMED KHAN LODHI Versus SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF SIND, HOME DEPARTMENT AND 2 OTHERS

Jurisdiction / Court
Service Tribunal Sind
Decided Date
Appeal No. 10 of 1979, decided on 24th March 1979.
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1980 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
Forum / Court Service Tribunal Sind
Bench Members N/A
Parties MUHAMMAD FAROOQ AHMED KHAN LODHI Versus SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF SIND, HOME DEPARTMENT AND 2 OTHERS
Primary Law Sind Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973)‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1980 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

This judgment primarily cites: Sind Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1980 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

The case was heard and decided by the Service Tribunal Sind bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1980 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (MUHAMMAD FAROOQ AHMED KHAN LODHI Versus SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF SIND, HOME DEPARTMENT AND 2 OTHERS). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Sind Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973)‑

Headnotes / Summary

S. 4‑Appeal challenging promotion order requiring re‑opening question of seniorityAffected persons not impleaded‑Appeal, in circumstances, held, suffered from serious infirmity for non‑impleading persons affected and also not maintainable involving fitness for promotion.

Judgment & Decree

GHULAM RASOOL SHEIKH (CHAIRMAN).‑

The appellant has claimed seniority in the fit list i.e. list prepared regarding fitness of promotion to higher grade. In the first place the persons likely to be affected by reopening the seniority have not been pleaded and so the application, thereby, suffers from serious inherent infirmity. Secondly the question of promotion oil fitness for promotion is excluded from the jurisdiction of this Tribunal. Appeal is summarily dismissed. Appeal dismissed.