Conditional legislation
Conditional legislation legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Conditional legislation Conditional" legislation-Provincial Government extending application of Central Act to Province-Central Act does not thereby become converted into a Provincial Act-Extension by Government of West Pakistan, of Criminal Law Amendment Act (XIV of 1908), to Province of West Pakistan by notification-Act (XIV of 1908), does not thereby become a Provincial Act so as to be subordinated, to the extent of "inconsistency", to provisions of a Central Act, vii., Political Parties Act (111 of 1962)Word "repugnancy" in Art. 110, Constitution of Pakistan (1956) "out-model", replaced by word "inconsistency" in Art. 134, Constitution of Pakistan (1962).
"Conditional legislation", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/22008
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Conditional legislation"
P L D 1952 Federal Court 29
SOBHO GYANCHANDANI‑Appellant Versus CROWN‑Respondent
Court: High Court2006 S C M R 109
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ZONE-C, LAHORE and others — Petitioners Versus Messrs KASHMIR EDIBILE OILS LTD. and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1988 S C M R 91
Messrs STANDARD PRINTING PRESS — Appellant Versus SIND EMPLOYEES' SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION — Respondent
Court: ---S. 1(3)--Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. .25--Interpretation of statute--Elementary principle and golden rule of--Statute- Construction of--Value of punctuation--Notification issued by Government under S. 1(3) of Ordinance (k of 1965) impugned as ultra vires of S.1(3), discriminatory and violative of Art.25 of Constitution--- Construction of statute examined--Held: While construing any statute Court should adhere to ordinary meaning of the words used and to their grammatical construction, unless the words when so read produce some manifest absurdity or injustice, inconsistency, inconvenience or incongruity; or unless the meaning so given be repugnant to the context, or at variance with the intention of Legislature as it is stated expressly or by implication, or as it may be collected from other parts of the same statute--Held further: Punctuation of statute is not traditionally regarded as its essential part and it can be disregarded of supplied--Where a statute is ambiguous, its punctuation may and should be considered and given weight especially where the act is carefully punctuated--If the punctuation is in accord with the suggested meaning of the statute, it is an important additional reason for the acceptance of that meaning--It should be given weight unless, from the punctuation of the whole statute, it is apparent that the punctuation must be disregarded in order to arrive at the legislative intention--In order to ascertain intention and purpose of the legislation, it is necessary to read the various provisions of the statute, so as to construe it as a whole.--Interpretation of statute.P L D 1960 (W
ALI AKBAR SHAH Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court:1965 P T D 494
TIGER WIRE PRODUCTS LTD.-Petitioner Versus SALES TAX OFFICER, COMPANIES CIRCLE I, DACCA AND OTHERS-
Court: Dacca (Pakistan)P L D 1960 (W
Sh. MUHAMMAD HANIF‑Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF WEST PAKISTAN AND ANOTHERS — Respondents
Court: (a) Punjab Municipal Act (III of 1911)------S. 255 and Punjab Municipal Election Rules, 1952, rr. 57, 67 and 67‑A‑Government ordering enquiry under. R. 67 pending election petition‑Disqualifica tion of candidate on report of enquiry officer‑Government competent to pass order under S. 255‑Mehbub llahi v. West Pakistan Government etc. P L D 1957 Lab. 63 rel. ; Abdul Latif v. M. R. Inayat P L D 1956 Lab. 537 and Ghulam Muhammad Butt v. West Pakistan Province P L D 1956 Lab. 572 ref.(1) P L D 1956 F C 178
ASGHAR ALI ‑Convict‑Petitioner Versus THE CROWN‑Respondent
Court:P L D 1965 (W
MUHAMMA D SHER AND OTHERS‑ — Petitioners Versus UNION COUNCIL, DHUDIAL AND OTHERS‑‑ — Respondents
Court: (c) Punjab Village Panchayat Act (XI of 1939), S. 19‑A as amended by Punjab Village Panchayat (Amendment) Act (IX of 1953), read with Punjab Municipal Act (III of 1911)‑Extension, by Government, of provisions of Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 to any Panchayat area‑Competent and not ultra vires.P L D 1969 Dacca 1
DACCA PICTURE PALACE LTD — Petitioner Versus PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISIRY OF EDUCATION AND INFORMATION AND OTHERS Respondents
Court:P
A. K. R. AHMED and others‑Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF EAST BENGAL‑Opposite Party
Court: High Court